loader

Disclaimer

The Bar Council of India does not permit advertisement or solicitation by advocates in any form or manner. By accessing this website, www.khaitanco.com, you acknowledge and confirm that you are seeking information relating to Khaitan & Co of your own accord and that there has been no form of solicitation, advertisement or inducement by Khaitan & Co or its members. The content of this website is for informational purposes only and should not be interpreted as soliciting or advertisement. No material/information provided on this website should be construed as legal advice. Khaitan & Co shall not be liable for consequences of any action taken by relying on the material/information provided on this website. The contents of this website are the intellectual property of Khaitan & Co.

Please accept the above
Close

Search

See all results for ""

Firm Matters

Hexaware Technologies Limited - Employment Advisory and Litigation

  • 20-Apr-2026

Khaitan & Co successfully represented Hexaware Technologies Ltd before the Central Government Industrial Tribunal No. I, Mumbai (“CGIT”) in a statutory appeal under Section 7I of the Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (“EPF Act”), allowing Hexaware’s appeal in entirety and setting aside the impugned order passed by the RPFC-I, Vashi under Section 7A of the EPF Act.

The matter arose from an assessment order dated 12 November 2024 whereby the EPFO had determined alleged provident fund liability of approximately INR 26.08 crores against Hexaware on allegations relating to inclusion of HRA, various allowances, trainees and alleged artificial wage splitting. At the interim stage, despite the statutory pre-deposit threshold potentially extending up to 75% of the assessed amount as a pre-condition for admission of appeal, an interim stay was granted subject to deposit of only 10% of the assessed amount.

By its final judgment, the CGIT accepted Hexaware’s submissions across all material issues and allowed the appeal by setting aside the Section 7A order, annulled the consequential demand of INR 26.08 crores, and directed refund of the amount deposited (10%) at the time of admission within eight weeks of receipt of the certified copy. 

Deal Team

The matter was handled by Jeevan Ballav Panda (Partner), Abhinav Rastogi (Partner), Jyoti Sinha (Partner), Dhriti Mehta (Senior Associate), Neha Thirani (Senior Associate) and Tapamoy Ghose (Associate)