loader

Disclaimer

The Bar Council of India does not permit advertisement or solicitation by advocates in any form or manner. By accessing this website, www.khaitanco.com, you acknowledge and confirm that you are seeking information relating to Khaitan & Co of your own accord and that there has been no form of solicitation, advertisement or inducement by Khaitan & Co or its members. The content of this website is for informational purposes only and should not be interpreted as soliciting or advertisement. No material/information provided on this website should be construed as legal advice. Khaitan & Co shall not be liable for consequences of any action taken by relying on the material/information provided on this website. The contents of this website are the intellectual property of Khaitan & Co.

Please accept the above
Close

Search

See all results for ""

Direct Tax Disputes Resolution Bill passed in the Lok Sabha

05-Mar-2020

Introduction

With an intent to reduce direct tax litigation pending before various courts/ appellate forums  [ie Supreme Court or High Court or Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) or Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) (CIT(A)), together referred to as Appellate Forum], the Government introduced ‘The Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Bill, 2020’ (Scheme) before the Lok Sabha on 05 February 2020 (please see our Ergo). Thereafter, various representations were made by the stakeholders expressing their concerns and suggested modifications to the Scheme. Government has noted these concerns and suitably modified the Scheme that has been passed by the Lok Sabha on 04 March 2020.

Notable changes made in the Scheme

Ø   

Scope of the Scheme enhanced

 

Originally the Scheme could only be availed by those taxpayers who have any appeal (whether filed by taxpayers or by tax authorities) pending before Appellate Forum as on 31 January 2020. Now, the following cases are also eligible for resolution under this Scheme.

 

§   

Taxpayers in whose case, orders have been passed by the tax authorities or CIT(A) or ITAT or High Court and the time limit for filing appeal against such orders has not expired as on 31 January 2020;

 

§   

Cases pending before ‘Dispute Resolution Panel’ (DRP) as on 31 January 2020;

 

§   

Cases where DRP has issued directions and the tax authorities have not passed any final order on or before 31 January 2020;

 

§   

Cases where revision petition has been filed before the Commissioner of Income-tax by the taxpayers and the same is pending as on 31 January 2020; and

 

§   

Search cases where the amount of disputed tax doesn’t exceed INR 50 million.

Ø   

Change in ‘Disputed tax’ definition

 

The revised formula for computing ‘disputed tax’ is as under:

 

S No

Status of the case as on 31 January 2020

Disputed tax amount (including surcharge and cess)

1.        

Appeal, writ petition or special leave petition pending before an Appellate Forum

Tax payable if such appeal, writ petition or special leave petition was to be decided against the taxpayers

2.        

Order in an appeal or in writ petition has been passed by High Court/ITAT/CIT(A) and the time limit for filing further appeal has not expired

Tax payable after giving effect to the order so passed

3.        

Order has been passed by the tax authorities and the time limit for filing appeal against such order has not expired 

Tax payable in accordance with such order

4.        

Objections filed before DRP are pending

Tax payable if DRP was to confirm proposed variation in the draft order

5.        

DRP has issued the directions and the tax authorities are yet to pass the final order

Tax payable as per the final order to be passed by the tax authorities

6.        

Revision petition filed under section 264 is pending 

Tax payable if such revision petition was not to be accepted 

 

With respect to cases where notice of enhancement has been issued by CIT(A) on or before 31 January 2020, the disputed tax amount will be increased by the amount of tax pertaining to issues covered in the enhancement notice.

Ø   

Options available to taxpayers for set off/ carry forward of ‘Minimum Alternate Tax’ (MAT) credit or any loss or depreciation

 

With respect to cases where tax dispute pertains to reduction in MAT credit, unabsorbed losses or depreciation, the taxpayers will now have an option to either:

 

§   

Include the amount of tax related to such MAT credit or losses or depreciation in the amount of disputed tax; or

 

§   

Carry forward the reduced MAT credit or losses or depreciation in such manner as may be prescribed. 

Ø   

Other key changes

 

§   

Now the taxpayers are required to submit proof of withdrawal of appeal or claim made in arbitration/conciliation/mediation at the time of making payment of amount determined under the Scheme;

 

§   

It has been clarified that making a declaration under this Scheme will not set any ‘precedent’ for subsequent proceedings of the taxpayers; and

 

§   

Taxpayers will now be entitled to get refund of excess amount paid under Income-tax Act in respect of his tax arrears which exceed the amount of disputed tax computed under the Scheme. However, no interest will be paid by Government on such excess tax payment.

Ø   

Amount that needs to be paid under the Scheme

       

To avail the benefit under this Scheme, taxpayer is required to make declaration in prescribed form (Declaration) before the designated authority being the designated Commissioner of Income Tax (Designated CIT) and required to pay the following amount:

Nature of tax demand

Amount payable under the Scheme on or before 31 March 2020

Amount payable under the Scheme after 31 March 2020 but on or before the last date of the Scheme

Tax demand raised pursuant to any assessment order (except orders passed pursuant to search action)

Amount of disputed tax. Taxpayer will get complete waiver from interest or penalty leviable or levied

Lower of the following:

110% of the disputed tax

OR

Disputed tax, plus applicable interest, penalty

Disputed interest / disputed penalty / disputed fee

25% of the disputed interest / disputed penalty / disputed fee

30% of the disputed interest / disputed penalty / disputed fee

Tax demand raised pursuant to assessment orders passed under search action

Lower of the following:

125% of the disputed tax

OR

Disputed tax, plus applicable interest, penalty

Lower of the following:

135% of the disputed tax

OR

Disputed tax, plus applicable interest, penalty

Note: In the following instances, taxpayers would only be required to pay 50% of the disputed tax/disputed interest/disputed penalty/disputed fee:

 

§   

Where appeal is filed by the tax authorities; or

 

§   

Where the taxpayer has filed an appeal before the CIT(A)/ITAT or objections before DRP and the issue is already decided in favour of the taxpayer in its own case by the ITAT/High Court.

 

Ø   

Who / what is not eligible for the Scheme

 

§   

Following tax disputes would not be eligible for this Scheme:

 

 

·          

Appeals against assessment orders passed pursuant to ‘search’ action if the disputed tax amount exceeds INR 50 million;

 

 

·          

Appeals against assessment orders involving undisclosed foreign income and foreign assets;

 

 

·          

Appeals against assessments or reassessment orders made pursuant to ‘Exchange of information’ received from foreign jurisdictions; and

 

 

·          

Appeals where ‘prosecution’ has been instituted on or before the date of filing of Declaration.

 

§   

Taxpayers in respect of whom prosecution for any offence punishable under inter alia the Indian Penal Code (initiated by Income tax authorities); Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002; the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988 etc has been instituted on or before the filing of Declaration, are also not eligible for the Scheme.

 

Comments

The amendments brought by the Government in the originally drafted Scheme clearly reflect the intention to reduce pending tax litigations. This is a welcome initiative as Government has done its bit by widening the scope of the Scheme, by responding to suggestions made by various stakeholders. Now it is upto the taxpayers to decide as to whether they should opt for the Scheme after considering the merits of their disputes. Having said that, given the fact that the payment can only be made once an order is passed by the Designated CIT determining the amount payable under this Scheme, taxpayers who opt for the Scheme should keep this in mind and consider filing Declaration as early as possible. This will ensure that the Designated CIT gets sufficient time to pass the Order and the amount so determined can be paid by 31 March 2020, in view of the fact that the Scheme provides for additional payment of taxes if payment is made after 31 March 2020. Even Central Board of Direct Taxes, Ministry of Finance in its Circular No. 07/2020 dated 04 March 2020 on the Scheme has stated that time limit of 15 days available to Designated CIT for passing an Order is an outer limit and has instructed the Designated CIT to pass an Order at an early date so that the taxpayers can make payment of the amount determined under the Scheme on or before 31 March 2020. The Scheme will be required to be passed by the Rajya Sabha and presidential assent will have to be obtained, which should happen very soon. Necessary application forms for filing declaration, payment of taxes etc are also expected to be notified soon.   

-      Sanjay Sanghvi (Partner), Raghav Kumar Bajaj (Principal Associate) and Ujjval Gangwal (Associate)

For any queries please contact: editors@khaitanco.com

 

 

 

Sanjay Sanghvi (partners)

We have updated our Privacy Policy, which provides details of how we process your personal data and apply security measures. We will continue to communicate with you based on the information available with us. You may choose to unsubscribe from our communications at any time by clicking here.

For private circulation only

The contents of this email are for informational purposes only and for the reader’s personal non-commercial use. The views expressed are not the professional views of Khaitan & Co and do not constitute legal advice. The contents are intended, but not guaranteed, to be correct, complete, or up to date. Khaitan & Co disclaims all liability to any person for any loss or damage caused by errors or omissions, whether arising from negligence, accident or any other cause.

© 2021 Khaitan & Co. All rights reserved.

Mumbai

One Forbes
3rd & 4th Floors, No. 1
Dr. V. B. Gandhi Marg
Fort, Mumbai 400 001

Chennai

119/65, First Floor
Dr Radhakrishnan Salai
Mylapore
Chennai 600 004,
India

Noida

Max Towers
7th & 8th Floors
Sector 16B, Noida
Gautam Buddh Nagar
201 301 India

Singapore

Ocean Financial Centre
#37-02 10 Collyer
37th Floor Quay
Raffles Place 049315,
Singapore