loader

Disclaimer

The Bar Council of India does not permit advertisement or solicitation by advocates in any form or manner. By accessing this website, www.khaitanco.com, you acknowledge and confirm that you are seeking information relating to Khaitan & Co of your own accord and that there has been no form of solicitation, advertisement or inducement by Khaitan & Co or its members. The content of this website is for informational purposes only and should not be interpreted as soliciting or advertisement. No material/information provided on this website should be construed as legal advice. Khaitan & Co shall not be liable for consequences of any action taken by relying on the material/information provided on this website. The contents of this website are the intellectual property of Khaitan & Co.

Please accept the above
Close

Search

See all results for ""

Firm Matters

Alembic Limited - Appeal against an order passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Gujarat

  • 07-Sep-2026

Khaitan & Co acted for the Client (Respondent), opposing an appeal against an order passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Gujarat, which had dismissed the Appellant's complaint alleging deficiency of service in the sale of a residential unit in the Respondent's “Samsara Luxury Apartments” project in Vadodara. The main contention raised by the Appellant was that the Respondent has extracted more monies towards the sale consideration as compared to the amount mentioned in the Sale Deed. Additionally, the Appellant raised concerns that an agreement to sell ought to have been executed.

The Firm successfully represented the Client before the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission and secured a favourable order dismissing the Appellant's appeal. The Firm's strategy centred on demonstrating that the registration of the flat for the Basic Sale Price of INR 79,25,400 was correct and compliant with law, distinguishing this from the balance amount of approximately INR 19,00,000 paid towards preferred location charges, club house charges, and other statutory and maintenance-related costs, which did not form part of the registrable value. The Firm successfully argued that the registration had been accepted by the registration authorities and remained unchallenged for several years, that no benefit had accrued to the Client from the manner of registration, and that any interference at this belated stage would unfairly prejudice other similarly placed allottees in the same project who were not parties to the proceedings. The Commission accepted these submissions in full, holding that the Appellant's contention regarding under-valuation of the registration was untenable, and dismissed the appeal, thereby affirming the order of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Gujarat, and successfully closing the matter in the Client's favour.

Deal Team

Alembic Limited

The core team consisted of Vanita Bhargava (Partner), Raddhika Khanna Tandon (Principal Associate), Vishal Shrivastava (Principal Associate) and Divya Singh Yadav (Associate).