loader

Disclaimer

The Bar Council of India does not permit advertisement or solicitation by advocates in any form or manner. By accessing this website, www.khaitanco.com, you acknowledge and confirm that you are seeking information relating to Khaitan & Co of your own accord and that there has been no form of solicitation, advertisement or inducement by Khaitan & Co or its members. The content of this website is for informational purposes only and should not be interpreted as soliciting or advertisement. No material/information provided on this website should be construed as legal advice. Khaitan & Co shall not be liable for consequences of any action taken by relying on the material/information provided on this website. The contents of this website are the intellectual property of Khaitan & Co.

Please accept the above
Close

Search

See all results for ""

Unaudited balance sheet sufficient for tax valuation purposes

02-Mar-2022

BACKGROUND

The Chandigarh bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in its recent decision in the case of Electra Paper and Board Pvt Ltd v. ITO [ITA NO.222/Chd./2021] has held that for computing the fair market value (FMV) of the shares of a company, for the purposes of section 56(2)(viib) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (IT Act), the unaudited balance sheet drawn as on the valuation date should be sufficient, if such unaudited balance sheet is subsequently audited with there being no difference in the audited and unaudited numbers.

As per section 56(2)(viib) of the IT Act, if a closely held company issues shares to residents at  premium in excess of the FMV of its shares, then such excess share premium is taxable  in the hands of the company (generally referred to as “Angel Tax”). For the purposes of determination of such FMV, the valuation rules (Rule 11U and Rule 11UA of the Income Tax Rules 1962 (IT Rules)) define the term ‘balance sheet’ as - the balance sheet of the company as drawn up on the valuation date (i.e., on the date of issue of shares) which has been audited by the auditor of the company appointed under the Companies Act, and if no balance sheet is drawn up on the valuation date, then the balance sheet drawn up as on a date immediately preceding the valuation date which has been approved and adopted in the annual general meeting of the company.

BRIEF FACTS

Ø  

The assessee, a private limited company (Taxpayer) issued shares on 31 March 2016 (Issuance Date) at INR 20, being in compliance with the FMV of such shares derived basis the unaudited balance sheet of the Taxpayer drawn on the Issuance Date.

Ø  

Subsequently, during the assessment proceedings for the financial year (FY) 2016-17, the tax officer held that as the balance sheet on the Issuance Date was unaudited, the last audited balance sheet of the Taxpayer as of 31 March 2015, should have been used for the purpose of determining the FMV of Taxpayer’s shares for the purposes of Angel Tax provisions. On this basis, the FMV of Taxpayer’s shares was determined as INR 17.32. Since the issue price was higher than the said FMV, the premium to FMV i.e., INR 2.68 per share (the difference between 20 and 17.32) aggregating to INR 8,55,590 was taxed as income of the Taxpayer under the Angel Tax provisions of the IT Act.

Ø  

In appeal before the first appellate authority, the addition made by the tax officer was upheld. Thus, the Taxpayer filed an appeal before the Chandigarh bench of the ITAT.

RULING

The ITAT referred to the definition of ‘balance sheet’ under Rule 11UA of IT Rules for ascertaining as to which balance sheet should be referred for determining the FMV of shares for the purposes of Angel Tax provisions. Accordingly the ITAT noted that the relevant balance sheet would either be: (a) the balance sheet as drawn up on the valuation date and which has been audited by auditor; or (b) if a balance sheet is not drawn up on the valuation date, then such balance-sheet drawn on a date immediately preceding the valuation date and audited by the auditors.

The ITAT observed that, in the instant case, given that a balance sheet was already drawn up on the Issuance Date, the case of the Taxpayer fell within part (a) of the definition of ‘balance sheet’. In so far as the requirement for such balance sheet to be audited, the ITAT held that there is no requirement under part (a) of the definition for such drawn up balance sheet on the Issuance Date to also be audited as on the same date and held that it would be sufficient if it is subsequently audited.

The ITAT noted that, in the case of the Taxpayer, the balance-sheet which was drawn up on the Issuance Date was subsequently audited and there were no differences between the unaudited and audited position. Thus, the FMV derived by the Taxpayer basis its unaudited balance sheet, as drawn up on the Issuance Date, was held by the ITAT to be in compliance with the Angel Tax Provisions.

Accordingly, the appeal of the Taxpayer was allowed and the addition made by the tax authorities was set aside.

COMMENTS

Finalisation of a company’s accounts followed by audit is a lengthy procedure – it entails considerable efforts, including exercise of professional judgment by the company's management as well as its auditors. Therefore, it is practically impossible for companies to finalise their accounts and have them audited immediately on the same date. The ITAT has acknowledged these practical considerations and provided relief to the Taxpayer.

Notably, similar valuation requirements apply in relation to transfer of shares under section 50CA and 56(2)(x) of the IT Act for the transferor as well as the recipient of shares. As per these provisions, if shares are transferred at a value lower than their the FMV, then there could be tax implications for the transferor as well as the recipient on a deeming basis. For the purposes of determining the FMV of shares in respect of the aforesaid provisions, the valuation rules define ‘balance sheet’ as – the balance sheet of the company as drawn up on the valuation date and which has been audited by the auditor of the company appointed under the applicable law in force relating to companies. Thus, this ruling should provide important guidance in relation to such transactions as well and so long as there is no material difference between audited and unaudited financials, unaudited financials drawn up on the valuation date (being the date of share transfer as per applicable rules), audited subsequently, should be considered as sufficient compliance.

-         Ritu Shaktawat (Partner), Jimmy Bhatt (Principal Associate) and Milind Hasrajani (Associate)

For any queries please contact: editors@khaitanco.com

Ritu Shaktawat (partners)

We have updated our Privacy Policy, which provides details of how we process your personal data and apply security measures. We will continue to communicate with you based on the information available with us. You may choose to unsubscribe from our communications at any time by clicking here.

For private circulation only

The contents of this email are for informational purposes only and for the reader’s personal non-commercial use. The views expressed are not the professional views of Khaitan & Co and do not constitute legal advice. The contents are intended, but not guaranteed, to be correct, complete, or up to date. Khaitan & Co disclaims all liability to any person for any loss or damage caused by errors or omissions, whether arising from negligence, accident or any other cause.

© 2021 Khaitan & Co. All rights reserved.

Mumbai

One Forbes
3rd & 4th Floors, No. 1
Dr. V. B. Gandhi Marg
Fort, Mumbai 400 001

Chennai

119/65, First Floor
Dr Radhakrishnan Salai
Mylapore
Chennai 600 004,
India

Noida

Max Towers
7th & 8th Floors
Sector 16B, Noida
Gautam Buddh Nagar
201 301 India

Singapore

Ocean Financial Centre
#37-02 10 Collyer
37th Floor Quay
Raffles Place 049315,
Singapore