The Bar Council of India does not permit advertisement or solicitation by advocates in any form or manner. By accessing this website, www.khaitanco.com, you acknowledge and confirm that you are seeking information relating to Khaitan & Co of your own accord and that there has been no form of solicitation, advertisement or inducement by Khaitan & Co or its members. The content of this website is for informational purposes only and should not be interpreted as soliciting or advertisement. No material/information provided on this website should be construed as legal advice. Khaitan & Co shall not be liable for consequences of any action taken by relying on the material/information provided on this website. The contents of this website are the intellectual property of Khaitan & Co.

Please accept the above


See all results for ""

No levy of interest on delayed payment of tax through ITC


Section 50 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act 2017 (CGST Act) was amended1 to provide that the interest on tax payable in respect of supplies made during a tax period and declared in the return for the relevant period furnished after the due date, except after commencement of any proceedings under section 73 or section 74 of the CGST Act in respect of the said period, shall be levied on that portion of the tax that is paid by debiting the electronic cash ledger. The amendment ensured that the taxpayers are not saddled with unnecessary interest liability on the amount paid through electronic credit ledger. After a gap of one year, the Government has now notified2 the said amendment to be effective from 1 September 2020.

In a more welcoming move, the Central Board of Indirect tax and Customs (CBIC) has issued a press release assuring that, while the above amendment is effective prospectively, the Central or the State tax administration would not make any recovery for past period as well, as decided by the GST Council in its 39th Meeting.


While there is no doubt that the notification as well as the press release comes as much desired relief for the taxpayers, it is pertinent that the taxpayer be cautious while discharging such past period liabilities, especially, in absence of any guidelines as to how the credit would be apportioned. It is also to be seen as to whether tax authorities would entertain any refund application for the interest paid on the delayed payment of tax by debiting the electronic credit ledger.

Dinesh Kumar Agrawal (Executive Director) and Pranay Sahay (Senior Associate)

For any queries please contact: editors@khaitanco.com



Vide Section 100 of the Finance Act 2019


Notification No. 63/2020-Central Tax dated 25 August 2020

Dinesh Agrawal (partners)

We have updated our Privacy Policy, which provides details of how we process your personal data and apply security measures. We will continue to communicate with you based on the information available with us. You may choose to unsubscribe from our communications at any time by clicking here.

For private circulation only

The contents of this email are for informational purposes only and for the reader’s personal non-commercial use. The views expressed are not the professional views of Khaitan & Co and do not constitute legal advice. The contents are intended, but not guaranteed, to be correct, complete, or up to date. Khaitan & Co disclaims all liability to any person for any loss or damage caused by errors or omissions, whether arising from negligence, accident or any other cause.

© 2021 Khaitan & Co. All rights reserved.


One Indiabulls Centre
13th Floor, Tower 1
841 Senapati Bapat Marg
Mumbai 400 013 India

T: +91 22 6636 5000

E: mumbai@khaitanco.com

New Delhi

Ashoka Estate, 12th Floor
24 Barakhamba Road
New Delhi 110 001 India

T: +91 11 4151 5454

E: delhi@khaitanco.com


Simal, 2nd Floor
7/1 Ulsoor Road
Bengaluru 560 042 India

T: +91 80 4339 7000

E: bengaluru@khaitanco.com


Emerald House
1B Old Post Office Street
Kolkata 700 001 India

T: +91 22 6636 5000

E: kolkata@khaitanco.com