loader

Disclaimer

The Bar Council of India does not permit advertisement or solicitation by advocates in any form or manner. By accessing this website, www.khaitanco.com, you acknowledge and confirm that you are seeking information relating to Khaitan & Co of your own accord and that there has been no form of solicitation, advertisement or inducement by Khaitan & Co or its members. The content of this website is for informational purposes only and should not be interpreted as soliciting or advertisement. No material/information provided on this website should be construed as legal advice. Khaitan & Co shall not be liable for consequences of any action taken by relying on the material/information provided on this website. The contents of this website are the intellectual property of Khaitan & Co.

Please accept the above
Close

Search

See all results for ""

Contract manufacturing of Drugs and Cosmetics Increased liability for marketers from 2021

07-Apr-2020

Background

The amendments dated 11 February 2020 to the Medical Devices Rules, 2017 and the Drugs and Cosmetics Rules, 1945 (Rules) broaden the scope of medical devices that fall within the purview of the Indian regulatory framework. On the same day, the Government released another notification amending the Rules with an aim to tighten the regulations in relation to marketing of drugs and medical devices (Amendment).   

Amendment

The Amendment introduced the concept of a ‘marketer’ and the compliances associated with being classified as one.

Marketer: For any person to be classified as a marketer, the following elements are required to be fulfilled:

Ø   

adoption of drugs manufactured by another manufacturer;

Ø   

adoption of such drugs in the capacity of an agent or any other capacity;

Ø   

adoption is under an agreement for marketing the drug; and

Ø   

the name of the marketer is affixed to the label of the drug with a view to sell and distribute.

The Amendment specifically states that no marketer will be permitted to adopt drugs manufactured by another manufacturer for marketing such drug by affixing its name in the label with a view to sell and distribute, unless it enters into a marketing agreement with the manufacturer of such drug.

Responsibility of a marketer: A marketer will, in addition to the actual manufacturer, be responsible for the quality of the drug as well as other regulatory compliances, currently assumed solely by the manufacturer under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 and the Rules (collectively DCA).

Labelling requirements for marketers: The Amendment prescribes that the name and address of the marketer is required to appear on the label of the innermost container of the drug as well as every other covering in which the container is packed. However, in case a drug is contained in an ampoule or a similar small container, only the name of the marketer will suffice.

Effective Date: The Amendment will be effective 1 March 2021.

Implications

Ø   

In 2018, an investigation by the Drugs Controller General of India revealed that many big pharmaceutical companies engage in the practice of procuring drugs manufactured by smaller contract manufacturers to ensure that they are not held liable for the quality of the drugs under the DCA (as the responsibility with respect to the quality assurance lies with the manufacturer under the DCA). This Amendment will have a substantial impact on the pharmaceutical companies engaging in such contract manufacturing activities, who will need to consider the compliance requirements and implement them sooner rather than later.

Ø   

The Amendment will result in increased quality of drugs, as it will help curb the rampant practice of marketing of unapproved or sub-standard or spurious drugs.

Ø   

As marketers will necessarily be required to enter into marketing agreements, their current contract manufacturing arrangements will need to be reviewed to ensure that they have trappings of a marketing agreement. On the other hand, any person that does not want to be classified as a marketer will also need to review its current contract manufacturing arrangements to prevent itself from inadvertently being classified as one.

Ø   

Typically, under contract manufacturing agreements, indemnity from the manufacturer is limited to manufacturing defects and claims arising in relation thereto. These indemnity protections may need to be re-negotiated to provide marketers back-to-back indemnity in relation to compliance with the requirements under the DCA.

Conclusion

The prolonged timeline allows persons procuring drugs through contract manufacturing arrangements to assess implications of being classified as a ‘marketer’ and review their agreements accordingly.

-       Sanchit Agarwal (Principal Associate) and Tanmaya Negi (Associate)

For any queries please contact: editors@khaitanco.com

We have updated our Privacy Policy, which provides details of how we process your personal data and apply security measures. We will continue to communicate with you based on the information available with us. You may choose to unsubscribe from our communications at any time by clicking here.

For private circulation only

The contents of this email are for informational purposes only and for the reader’s personal non-commercial use. The views expressed are not the professional views of Khaitan & Co and do not constitute legal advice. The contents are intended, but not guaranteed, to be correct, complete, or up to date. Khaitan & Co disclaims all liability to any person for any loss or damage caused by errors or omissions, whether arising from negligence, accident or any other cause.

© 2021 Khaitan & Co. All rights reserved.

Mumbai

One Forbes
3rd & 4th Floors, No. 1
Dr. V. B. Gandhi Marg
Fort, Mumbai 400 001

Chennai

119/65, First Floor
Dr Radhakrishnan Salai
Mylapore
Chennai 600 004,
India

Noida

Max Towers
7th & 8th Floors
Sector 16B, Noida
Gautam Buddh Nagar
201 301 India

Singapore

Ocean Financial Centre
#37-02 10 Collyer
37th Floor Quay
Raffles Place 049315,
Singapore