The Bar Council of India does not permit advertisement or solicitation by advocates in any form or manner. By accessing this website, www.khaitanco.com, you acknowledge and confirm that you are seeking information relating to Khaitan & Co of your own accord and that there has been no form of solicitation, advertisement or inducement by Khaitan & Co or its members. The content of this website is for informational purposes only and should not be interpreted as soliciting or advertisement. No material/information provided on this website should be construed as legal advice. Khaitan & Co shall not be liable for consequences of any action taken by relying on the material/information provided on this website. The contents of this website are the intellectual property of Khaitan & Co.

Please accept the above


See all results for ""

Companies Act takeover provisions notified


The Ministry of Corporate Affairs has, on 3 February 2020, issued the long pending notification of sub-sections 11 and 12 of Section 230 of the Companies Act, 2013 (Companies Act). These sub-sections provide for the takeover of minority shareholders by majority shareholders in unlisted companies through a scheme of arrangement placed before the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) in the same manner as other schemes of arrangement under Section 230, subject to the specific changes below. The procedural aspects of these takeovers have been set out in new rules inserted in the Companies (Compromises, Arrangements and Amalgamations) Rules, 2016 (Merger Rules) as well as the National Company Law Tribunal Rules, 2016 (NCLT Rules) on the same day.

The new sub-rule (5) inserted in Rule 3 of the Merger Rules allows for a ‘member’ (i.e., an initial subscriber to the memorandum of association or a person whose name is entered in the register of members or as a beneficial owner in the records of a depository) of a company who, together with other members of the company who hold at least three-fourths of the shares in the company, to apply to the NCLT for the acquisition of any part of the remaining shares of the company. The explanation to the said rule clarifies that “shares” includes only equity shares with voting rights and any other securities that entitles the holder thereof to exercise voting rights. The takeover offer made by the aforementioned three-fourth majority must compulsorily contain:


the report on the price of shares from a registered valuer that takes into account (i) the highest price paid for the acquisition of the shares of the company during the last twelve months, and (ii) the fair price after taking into account valuation parameters including return on net worth, book value of shares, earning per share, price earning multiple vis-à-vis the industry average and any other customary valuation parameters for such companies; and


details of a separate bank account opened by the applicant where one-half of the offered consideration has to be deposited.

Section 230 (12) allows any person aggrieved with a takeover offer to make an application to the NCLT. Rule 80A included in the NCLT Rules adds that such application is to be made in Form NCLT-1 and has to be accompanied by (i) a verifying affidavit, (ii) a memorandum of appearance with authorising board resolution or vakalatnama, (iii) documents in support of the grievance, and (iv) any other relevant documents.

It remains to be seen how many shareholders will actually be able to make use of these provisions, given the difficulty faced in the execution of the minority acquisition provisions under the Companies Act that have been in force prior to this notification, i.e., Sections 235 and 236 of the Companies Act. The conferment of powers on shareholders to file grievances with the NCLT without laying out parameters for the NCLT to evaluate such grievances seems counterintuitive for the purposes of a process that is court supervised to begin with. It is, therefore, likely that there will be much confusion around the implementation of schemes under these provisions as well as doubts about its utility until there is a substantial body of precedents from the NCLT and its appellate authorities. Also, the requirement to compute the required shareholding threshold through equity shares and other securities carrying voting rights may result in the exclusion of many security-holders from the process and skewed representation of the “majority” and “minority” in these matters given the usage of convertible or hybrid instruments for making investments or acquiring interest in companies these days.

-   Rishabh Bharadwaj (Partner) and Kamlesh Rao (Senior Associate)

For any queries please contact: editors@khaitanco.com


We have updated our Privacy Policy, which provides details of how we process your personal data and apply security measures. We will continue to communicate with you based on the information available with us. You may choose to unsubscribe from our communications at any time by clicking here.

For private circulation only

The contents of this email are for informational purposes only and for the reader’s personal non-commercial use. The views expressed are not the professional views of Khaitan & Co and do not constitute legal advice. The contents are intended, but not guaranteed, to be correct, complete, or up to date. Khaitan & Co disclaims all liability to any person for any loss or damage caused by errors or omissions, whether arising from negligence, accident or any other cause.

© 2021 Khaitan & Co. All rights reserved.


One Indiabulls Centre
13th Floor, Tower 1
841 Senapati Bapat Marg
Mumbai 400 013 India

T: +91 22 6636 5000

E: mumbai@khaitanco.com

New Delhi

Ashoka Estate, 12th Floor
24 Barakhamba Road
New Delhi 110 001 India

T: +91 11 4151 5454

E: delhi@khaitanco.com


Simal, 2nd Floor
7/1 Ulsoor Road
Bengaluru 560 042 India

T: +91 80 4339 7000

E: bengaluru@khaitanco.com


Emerald House
1B Old Post Office Street
Kolkata 700 001 India

T: +91 22 6636 5000

E: kolkata@khaitanco.com