The Bar Council of India does not permit advertisement or solicitation by advocates in any form or manner. By accessing this website, www.khaitanco.com, you acknowledge and confirm that you are seeking information relating to Khaitan & Co of your own accord and that there has been no form of solicitation, advertisement or inducement by Khaitan & Co or its members. The content of this website is for informational purposes only and should not be interpreted as soliciting or advertisement. No material/information provided on this website should be construed as legal advice. Khaitan & Co shall not be liable for consequences of any action taken by relying on the material/information provided on this website. The contents of this website are the intellectual property of Khaitan & Co.

Please accept the above


See all results for ""

CCI updates the guidance notes to Form I


In August 2019, the Competition Commission of India (CCI) amended the Competition Commission of India (Procedure in regard to the transaction of business relating to combinations) Regulations, 2011 (Combination Regulations) to: (i) introduce an automatic approval route for transactions where there is absence of any horizontal, vertical or complementary overlaps between businesses of the parties (Green Channel Route or GCR); and (ii) provide a substantially revised Form I format with incremental queries (Revised Form I). 

In order to clarify the scope of information required to be furnished along with the Revised Form I and illustrate the eligibility criteria for GCR, the CCI published revised guidance notes to Form I on 27 March 2020 (Guidance Note).

The key takeaways from the Guidance Note are set out below:


Revised Form I



Expansion of disclosure of contractual rights acquired in a combination




The Guidance Note requires that parties expressly set out the special rights acquired pursuant to a transaction. To this end, disclosure will be required of veto rights, affirmative voting rights, right to nominate a director, right to appoint an observer on a target’s board, information sharing rights as well as other rights or advantage of commercial nature acquired in the target or any other enterprise.




The rationale behind this requisition perhaps stems from the recent trend where several minority acquisitions are coupled with strategic collaborations that allow the purchaser to acquire a degree of influence or commercial advantage in relation to the target’s business affairs.



Relaxation in duration of market facing information with low combined market shares:




The Revised Form I had expanded the scope of market facing information and sought details of market size and market share information for three (3) years instead of one (1) year for all business overlaps. This was the position regardless of the combined market shares of the transacting parties.




As a relief, the Guidance Note clarifies that three (3) years data is only needed if the combined market share of parties is 10% or above in the concerned overlapping market. As a corollary, where combined market shares are less than 10%, parties need not furnish market data for three (3) years.



Complementary overlaps explained




The Revised Form I included disclosure on complementary overlaps for merger assessments in addition to horizontal and vertical overlaps but did not provide any guidance on the definition of complementary products.




The absence of clarity surrounding complementary overlaps resulted in uncertainty and unpredictability since the parties remained oblivious to the expectation of the CCI. However, the Guidance Note now defines complementary products/services and clarifies the scope to be those products/services that are related because they are combined and used together (e.g., printers and ink cartridges). It explains that complementary products are not vertically related, do not compete, and generally enhance the value of the combined product or service.


Eligibility criteria for GCR


To avail of GCR, there should be no horizontal, vertical and complementary overlaps between: (i) the parties to the combination; (ii) their respective group entities; and (iii) any entity in which they, directly or indirectly, hold shares and/or control.

It was suspected that inclusion of point (iii) above will materially diminish the effectiveness of GCR considering that based on the bare text of the expression “hold shares and/or control”, holding a single share in a company engaged in overlapping business with the acquirer or target could disqualify the transaction from benefiting from GCR. However, in practice, the CCI was taking a liberal view by allowing transactions to avail GCR despite some shareholding in competing portfolio.

In furtherance of such spirit, the Guidance Note now clarifies the contours that need to be considered for point (iii) above. As such, only those companies where parties:




hold a direct or indirect shareholding of 10% or more; or




have a right or ability to exercise any right (including any advantage of commercial nature with any of the party or its affiliates) that is not available to an ordinary shareholder; or




have a right or ability to nominate a director or observer.

will need to be considered.


The Guidance Note is a welcome step as it elucidates the exact scope of information required to be filed for the Revised Form I. In effect, it sets out the expectation of the CCI in a merger filing. This clarity will enable parties to file comprehensive merger applications and consequently avoid invalidations.

However, a few pressure points which may result in hardship for transacting parties would be collation of granular data for assessing overlaps in companies where the acquirer holds rights or commercial advantages or has the ability to appoint an observer. This is an onerous requirement and may also narrow down the scope of eligibility of transactions for GCR which, in reality do not pose any competitive concerns.

It is also interesting to note that the enunciation of the expression “any entity in which they, directly or indirectly, hold shares and/or control” possibly has roots in the concept of “material influence” that has been introduced in the Competition Act (Amendment) Bill, 2020, which seeks to broaden the definition of control under the existing statutory framework.

The Guidance Note can be accessed here.

-          Anisha Chand (Partner), Swati Bala (Senior Associate) and Anmol Awasthi (Associate)

For any queries, please contact: editors@khaitanco.com

Anisha Chand (partners)

We have updated our Privacy Policy, which provides details of how we process your personal data and apply security measures. We will continue to communicate with you based on the information available with us. You may choose to unsubscribe from our communications at any time by clicking here.

For private circulation only

The contents of this email are for informational purposes only and for the reader’s personal non-commercial use. The views expressed are not the professional views of Khaitan & Co and do not constitute legal advice. The contents are intended, but not guaranteed, to be correct, complete, or up to date. Khaitan & Co disclaims all liability to any person for any loss or damage caused by errors or omissions, whether arising from negligence, accident or any other cause.

© 2021 Khaitan & Co. All rights reserved.


One Indiabulls Centre
13th Floor, Tower 1
841 Senapati Bapat Marg
Mumbai 400 013 India

T: +91 22 6636 5000

E: mumbai@khaitanco.com

New Delhi

Ashoka Estate, 12th Floor
24 Barakhamba Road
New Delhi 110 001 India

T: +91 11 4151 5454

E: delhi@khaitanco.com


Simal, 2nd Floor
7/1 Ulsoor Road
Bengaluru 560 042 India

T: +91 80 4339 7000

E: bengaluru@khaitanco.com


Emerald House
1B Old Post Office Street
Kolkata 700 001 India

T: +91 22 6636 5000

E: kolkata@khaitanco.com