The Bar Council of India does not permit advertisement or solicitation by advocates in any form or manner. By accessing this website, www.khaitanco.com, you acknowledge and confirm that you are seeking information relating to Khaitan & Co of your own accord and that there has been no form of solicitation, advertisement or inducement by Khaitan & Co or its members. The content of this website is for informational purposes only and should not be interpreted as soliciting or advertisement. No material/information provided on this website should be construed as legal advice. Khaitan & Co shall not be liable for consequences of any action taken by relying on the material/information provided on this website. The contents of this website are the intellectual property of Khaitan & Co.

Please accept the above


See all results for ""

CBIC Clarifies Applicability of GST on Directors’ Remuneration


The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) has issued a circular dated 10 June 2020 (Circular), clarifying the applicability of goods and services tax (GST) on the remuneration paid to whole time directors and independent directors. Services rendered by an employee to his/her employer in the course of, or in relation to, his/her employment are not exigible to GST, and therefore, the moot issue was whether services provided by directors are in the course of employment or not.

The uncertainty in the industry stemmed from the conflicting advance rulings issued by the tax authorities in the cases of M/s. Alcon Consulting Engineers (India) Pvt. Ltd. [Advance Ruling No. RAJ/AAR/2019-20/33 dated 20 February 2020] and M/s Clay Craft India Pvt. Ltd. [Advance Ruling No. KAR ADRG 83/2019 dated 25 September 2019] where the authorities ruled that GST is payable on directors’ remuneration, and the ruling in the case of Anil Agarwal [Advance Ruling No. KAR ADRG 30/2020 dated 4 May 2020] where the tax authority opined that the salary paid to an executive director shall not be subject to GST as such services would have been provided in the course of employment.


The Circular has clearly distinguished between directors who are also employees of the company and others who just serve as directors and are not employees of the company. In this context reliance is placed on the definition of  ‘whole time director‘ under Section 2(94) of the Companies Act, 2013 (‘Companies Act’) and provisions concerning appointment of ‘independent director’ under section 149(6) of the Companies Act read with Rule 12 of Companies (Share Capital and Debentures) Rules, 2014. A ‘whole time director’ includes a director in the whole-time employment of the company, while an ‘independent director’ cannot be an employee of the company while serving as a director. Relying on these differences, the CBIC has concluded that:


If a director is not engaged as an employee of the company, services provided by such director are liable to GST. The company (as a recipient of such services) is required to discharge GST on a reverse charge basis in such cases as per Notification No. 13/2017- Central Tax (Rate) dated 28 June 2017.


In case a director is a ‘whole time director’ and is also engaged in the capacity of an employee, then such person may be entitled to remuneration in a dual capacity, that is, salary for services provided as an employee, and sitting fees for the services rendered as a director. In such cases:



Any sum paid as salary on which Tax is Deducted at Source (‘TDS’) under Section 192 of the Income Tax Act 1961, would not be subjected to GST as that is consideration received for service rendered by an employee to an employer in the course of employment, which falls within Schedule III of the CGST Act;



Any sum paid as sitting fees which is subjected to TDS under Section 194J of the Income Tax Act 1961, will also be subjected to GST, as it is consideration received for services provided by a director to the company. The company is required to discharge GST on a reverse charge basis in such cases as per Notification No. 13/2017- Central Tax (Rate) dated 28 June 2017.


While there was clarity on the taxability of services rendered by directors who are not employees of the company, the issue regarding taxability of services rendered by a ‘whole time director’ remained vexed under the erstwhile service tax regime and continued to be so under the GST regime. In the case of Allied Blenders & Distillers Pvt. Ltd. vs Commissioner of CST [2019 (24) G.S.T.L. 207 (Tri. - Mumbai)] and PCM Cement Concrete Pvt. Ltd. vs Commissioner [2018 (9) G.S.T.L. 391 (Tri.-Kolkata)], the Central Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (‘CESTAT’) concluded that all remuneration received by whole time directors was received in the capacity of an employee and accordingly, no service tax was applicable. The decision in PCM Cement Concrete Pvt. Ltd. has been challenged by the revenue department and is pending before the Supreme Court.

The Circular seems to have streamlined the view regarding taxability of remuneration received by directors on the basis of the tax treatment of such sums under the Income Tax Act, 1961. However, it fails to independently analyse the role of a ‘whole time director’ as an employee and also runs contrary to the decision of the Hon’ble Allahabad High Court in the case of Sardar Harpreet Singh vs Commissioner of Income Tax [1990 SCC Online All 929] where it was held that merely on basis of nature of tax deduction at source under the Income Tax, an employer-employee relationship between director and company cannot be decided. It is the agreement entered into between the company and the director that should reveal the nature of the relationship.

Given that the Companies Act also mandates maintenance of contract of service or written memorandum setting out terms of employment of a whole time director, perhaps the CBIC should have relied on such ‘contract of service’ instead of applicability of TDS provisions under the Income Tax Act, 1961 to determine the nature of relationship between the company and the whole time director and the capacity in which remuneration is being paid.

-          Dinesh Agrawal (Executive Director) and Anjali Krishnan (Senior Associate)

For any queries please contact: editors@khaitanco.com

Dinesh Agrawal (partners)

We have updated our Privacy Policy, which provides details of how we process your personal data and apply security measures. We will continue to communicate with you based on the information available with us. You may choose to unsubscribe from our communications at any time by clicking here.

For private circulation only

The contents of this email are for informational purposes only and for the reader’s personal non-commercial use. The views expressed are not the professional views of Khaitan & Co and do not constitute legal advice. The contents are intended, but not guaranteed, to be correct, complete, or up to date. Khaitan & Co disclaims all liability to any person for any loss or damage caused by errors or omissions, whether arising from negligence, accident or any other cause.

© 2021 Khaitan & Co. All rights reserved.


One Indiabulls Centre
13th Floor, Tower 1
841 Senapati Bapat Marg
Mumbai 400 013 India

T: +91 22 6636 5000

E: mumbai@khaitanco.com

New Delhi

Ashoka Estate, 12th Floor
24 Barakhamba Road
New Delhi 110 001 India

T: +91 11 4151 5454

E: delhi@khaitanco.com


Simal, 2nd Floor
7/1 Ulsoor Road
Bengaluru 560 042 India

T: +91 80 4339 7000

E: bengaluru@khaitanco.com


Emerald House
1B Old Post Office Street
Kolkata 700 001 India

T: +91 22 6636 5000

E: kolkata@khaitanco.com